data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b4a7/3b4a7a8f5c216a2e43db4e6ab5b40e8b2bfee92c" alt=""
My experience: I did contact my Congressman (Mike Rogers R-MI) to express my views and ask for his support of HR 2060. I was a tad disappointed with his reply - here it is - dated April 30th:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30597/30597ca2c9e44796454e35edf978dfbe469526b7" alt=""
I understand your concern that federal copyright law has led to a potential double standard in royalty rates paid by web broadcasters versus traditional over-the-air radio. As you may know, the CRB is currently reviewing their previous decision and I am hopeful that a more amendable solution can be found. However, I also believe this case is another example of the need for fundamental reform of our national copyright system. A successful digital copyright system will have to be built on the principle of respect for the rights copyright holders, producers, broadcasters and consumers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1daa7/1daa73c1bb9e9369c907bfc1d58141572b608cdf" alt=""
I never expressed any concerns over a "double standard"; I simply made the point that proposed CRB rates puts webcasters in jeopardy and asked for support on the new bill. Yes - I followed up. No reply...yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment